Key new news not known before. Hillary and Obama’s Chief Political Advisor, Obama not present, had a meeting the night of the attack. They had 10 issues to discuss and 5 of those issues were focused on the Video they claimed for weeks to be the cause of the attack. In this report is news that was recently leaked prior to this report coming out, Hillary sent an email to her daughter, the evening of the attack, telling her it was a terrorist attack. The next morning she communicated with the President of Egypt that it was a terror attack. But then the political spin kicked into action. It was the video causing a spontaneous uprising. Another piece of new news was that there were military personnel ready to go but they ended up changing clothes 4 times because someone couldn’t decide whether they should be in uniform or civilian attire. The the Secretary to the Department of Defense says go, they go. Why didn’t they? That order had to have been overruled. A pile of horse apples already began stacking up the evening of the attack.
The principals at play all knew it was a terror attack. Because Egypt had experienced a spontaneous uprising earlier, it became a convenience to Hillary and the Chief Political advisor to the president that selling the video was the course they would take because they were 56 days away from an election and news of a terrorist attack could hurt the election results for Obama’s second term since one of his talking points to getting elected was that he had decimated Al Qaeda and they were on the run.
Secondly, although the Secretary for Defense had issued an order for the military to go rescue those in Benghazi who were under attack (which basically confirmed that they already knew they were dealing with a terrorist attack), not any military assets were dispatched to Benghazi. The president and his cabinet could watch and clearly see that an attack was underway because they had two drones in the air over Benghazi. They could deploy drones so they could watch but they did not deploy any military assets to save those Americans, including the Ambassador.
And then I keep hearing the question being asked why they followed this course of action. It is quite simple. If you sent in the military, you would admit they were witnessing a full blown terror attack. If you did not send these people in, you could sell the video scam to the American people. Isn’t it interesting that a group of military did deploy from Tripoli against orders but they were held up at the Benghazi airport pending approval of the Libyan government? If the Libyan government couldn’t prevent the attack in the first place, why do we need their approval. But then that approval never came. Eventually, a group of Libyan freedom fighters who sided with the Americans came in to save those remaining who were still alive. That story is quite clear if you watch the movie “13 hours” which documents what happened at Benghazi.
A group of CIA Annex security folks left against orders, after being told they did not have to go. They all volunteered to go try to save lives at the US mission complex. And they stayed there 3 hours before returning to the CIA Annex with the body of one person who was killed but they could not find the Ambassador. The documentary “13 Hours” was named so because the entire ordeal lasted 13 hours. For that length of time, not one rescue mission was set in motion. A couple of F-16s could have been there within an hour or so. The buzzing of F-16s would have been enough to scare the attackers away. Also, the members of the security teams in both places had the ability to call in air strikes from those F-16s. And there could have been additional F-16s to back up the first F-16s and C-130 gunships could have been on station to back them up. My son does that type of work. Just one person communicating with aircraft in the skies overhead could have completely ended the conflict within a few hours.
I am retired military and I know how much firepower can be brought to bear in a very short period of time. That single person I referred to can control attack helicopters, C-130 gunships, A-10s, Jets and B-52 bombers. One bomber can hold as much as 30,000 pounds of guided armaments. It is a total lie to say no assets were available. One A-10 Warthog could spray the entire area around the two compound with thousands of rounds every second. The rounds hit the target before those on the ground can hear them fire. I witnessed this happening in Afghanistan with a video on YouTube where you could see the bullets hitting the ground before you could hear the sound of those bullets firing from the A-10. The most damaging news of all was the CIA had already picked up communications that clearly indicated an attack was eminent. That was new news. And having that information would have clearly required that overhead support would be in the air on station. But even with the prior warning, our President and his Secretary of State chose not to back up those on the ground. That means even before the attack began they had already decided to do nothing.
The problem is Obama and Hillary were claiming victory in Libya because they played a major role in bringing down Kaddafi. They could not afford politically to see news coming from Libya that Benghazi was following apart. The CIA already had documented numerous events to demonstrate that the crumbling of Benghazi was underway. Ambassador Stevens was working with Hillary to visit Benghazi for a political demonstration that the US was in support of the new government in the process of forming. But the CIA Annex had a separate mission that was highly classified. They were running guns from Libya to Syria. They could not have begun that mission without approval from the President and the Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton. It was Fast and Furious all over again. That news would have tanked Obama’s chances of reelection. To this day, they are still avoiding talking about that but the news is already out. Here we have an event that is still “Top Secret” but everyone is talking about it. Deniability is still in full swing because that news if confirmed would derail Clinton’s chances for reelection. This is not old news, this is current news since we are about to elect a new president.
To save their butts, they had to deny everything about what was going on in Benghazi and the attack itself. They deliberately tried to hide it until re-election of Obama. And now they have to continue the scam the American people so they can get Hillary elected. For the past 8 years the Democrats have been blaming George Bush for everything that has gone wrong during Obama’s Presidency. The cry that “Bush Lied, People died” was a common phrase heard over and over before Obama was elected in 2008. So why are we not hearing the same thing now, “Obama and Hillary Lied and Americans Died” in Benghazi. The only difference is Bush didn’t lie at the time he went into Iraq, and just about every Democrat member of Congress voted in agreement that going into Iraq was necessary. As the election came near after Bush’s 2nd 4 years in office, the “Bush Lied” line was just a talking point for political reasons. But now we have American’s who actually died in Benghazi because Democrats needed to protect themselves politically. They were willing to sacrifice American lives for political expediency. The perpetuation of the “VIDEO LIE” was real. They really did let people die in Benghazi because staying in power was more important and saving American lives.
And now Hillary Clinton claims she is more qualified to be president than anyone else. If she lied once she will lie again if it means she will be able to stay in power. Secondly, she will appoint liberal judges to the Supreme Court. That means she will have taken over the Executive Branch and The Judicial Branch of our Government. She will then be able to destroy the lives of all of us by changing the entire cultural makeup of the USA. Congress will not matter anymore because building the strength of the poor by giving them more and more benefits, will change the entire Congress to be dominated by Democrats. We will then have what they have wanted all along, a one party government when they are supposed to be in favor of a two party system for the benefit of maintaining a democratically run country, run by the people.
Both Obama and Hillary are following a very simple plan they both support; the teaching of Saul Alinsky. This guy has been dead for over 4 decades. But he had an amazing impact on his followers, two of which are Obama and Hillary. She wrote a thesis on this guy when she was in college and Obama wrote about him in his book. Here is what Saul Alinsky preached.
Control the Healthcare and you will control the people (we now have Obamacare that was forced on us by Democrats changing the rules in the Senate to get it passed). Alinsky says increase the poverty level as much as possible because if the government is providing the poor with everything they need, they will not fight back (This means all the poor will vote Democrat to protect their benefits from government). Increase the debt so you will be forced to raise taxes (we are now 20 trillion dollars in debt and the Democrats keep harping about a need to raise taxes). Alinsky also taught the need to implement gun control to take away the ability of the people to fight back against government; permitting the establishment of a police state (a recent terrorist attack was overshadowed by a push for gun control and the Democrats in the House of Representatives staged a sit in on the floor bringing to halt the work being done for all the people, Republicans, Libertarians and Democrats. They were trying to force their way on gun control without due process called by our Constitution. What they did is a violation of house ethics rules).
Alinsky teaches the need to maximize welfare to the point where the government controls Food, Housing and Income (we have now reached the breaking point where the number of people on welfare just about equals the number of people working). Also, control education by controlling what children learn in school and what adults read and information they have access to (The Press is already controlling what the people read and most news channels support democrats by covering up their misdeeds and finding fault with anyone who does not support the democrat party. And then we have Common Core being forced on our entire education system by the Federal Government). Lastly, divide the nation between the wealthy and the poor by broadening the divide. (We constantly hear about the rich 1% and how they need to pay their fair share).
Where did Alinsky get these ideas? From the teaching of Vladimir Lenin’s original scheme to take control of the entire world placing it under Russian Communist rule. Democracy has always been under attack by those who want to impose a more socialist type society. Just one step beyond that is communism. Gaining power by using Alinsky teachings is a means to an end.
The Democrats are at the point now where they cannot maintain power unless they use these Alinsky type tactics to increase their voting base. They need to increase the number of poor people, they need more illegal Hispanic aliens so the legal Hispanics will be inclined to vote democrat. They continue to promise a better life for blacks in our inner cities by pitting the black community against police, playing the race card constantly by calling anyone who differs from the democrat party racist. It is interesting to note that all the major cities where the black communities are suffering from over 80% of all homicides (black on black homicides with guns and a majority out of work), the highest death rate for drug use and communities devastated by poverty, are cities run by Democrat majors. If those Democrat mayors tried to crack down on the problems in these communities, they would be voted out of office. Democrats play the hate card to get votes from the Gay community and they use the same hate message when a terrorist attack happens in the US. The democrats hate Christians but they push the hate card when Islam is concerned. Oddly, Christians and Muslim worship the same God.
We have a “new” report about what really happened at Benghazi. But then we hear from the main stream news agencies that “No new evidence to support what Hillary did wrong.” So they are saying Hillary did something wrong and all the news in the report supports that; it is just old news. But how can it be old news when that news is only 4 years old and now the person who they say still did something wrong is now running for President of the United States? Anything a Republican does in his and her past, even when they were in high school, is fair game as far as Democrats are concerned. So that means, the news that is only 4 years old is definitely fresh news and fair game. Hillary clearly lied by passing the video scam on the entire nation. How could she not do the same thing again as President? It all has to do with maintaining political power at all cost; including using the death of Americans to further her political power. History is full of political figures who would not think twice about sacrificing the lives of their own people for political gain. They sacrificed the deaths and injuries of over 100 Americans in a night club full of innocent people attacked by an Islamic terrorist by not calling it an Islamic terrorist attack. And then focused not on the threat of Islamic terror killing Americans but on the need to take guns away from Americans. They never miss an opportunity to push for the teaching of Alinsky – in this case, gun control.
The Constitution of the United States clearly establishes the fact that the people of the United States are the ones responsible for the control of our government – Nowhere in that document does it say the Democrat Party should rule the nation and all the people have to do what they say. The Democrat Party needs to be sent a lesson to reform their ways. We still need a two party system with neither party trying to destroy the other in favor of a dictatorship. If a person continues to support Hillary Clinton for President, then they are willing to sacrifice innocent American lives to further the power of a party determined to take away their right to vote. It will be too late to realize what is happening to them. There lives will not get better because the will essentially be under the control of a government that no longer needs a democratic voting system established in the first place to protect them from tyranny.
It is amazing how really smart people are voting themselves into a position where their vote will no longer help them improve their lives. Lenin referred to these people as “Useful Idiots.” Oddly, a significant number of these folks have college degrees and they were led down this path by their extremely intelligent professors. It should be noted that the first folks who were sent to the work camps by the Russian Gulag for the rest of their lives were what they referred to as the Intelligentsia, the “Highly Educated Useful Idiots.”