The Liberal Destruction of America – It’s Real!

This country is under attack to a very small extent from Islamic terrorists but in a major since from liberals. It amazes me how people who want population control, control over when old people die and bike trails and walking paths instead of Freeways and urban sprawl, get away with such an open assault on the American way of life. And there are millions who do not have a clue as to what they are up to but vote blindly for them just because they happen to have a “D” behind their name.

We had a 12 year Governor, 3 terms, who got his law degree from Berkley in California. His name is Richard “Dick” Lamm. He went by the name “Dick” but those not so close to him preceded his nickname with the word “big.” He had a very strong environmental bent. In fact, he fought to kill the project of a Highway system that encircled 3/4th of Denver: East, South and West. The northern part of Denver had I-70 running, east to west, across the country. His reasons were twofold. He has always been a “control population” advocate and an environmentalist hell bent on protecting the Colorado landscape from urban sprawl. He was so worried about environmental problems that he managed to stop the Winter Olympics from coming to Colorado when Colorado was already accepted. Innsbruck, Austria was then given the event.

He loves Boulder, which is commonly referred to as the “People’s Republic of Boulder. They are the ones who harp about racism the most yet their community is 88% white and .9 % black. They want the rest of us to be more accepting of minorities by taking them in as our neighbors; yet they are not welcome in Boulder. The next largest group are Hispanic or Latino at 8.7%. Gosh. I wonder what all those Hispanics are doing in Boulder. Could it be that the average price of a home is near $550,000? They say it that way to make it look smaller but when they are praising what they do for 550K, they call it over a half million.  It is amazing how that works.

But big “Dick Lamm” is featured on National Public Radio often. But very few outsiders really hear what he has been saying for years. That tells me his insight on how to get control of our country is following right in line with what Democrats have been planning for many years. So let’s get into what Lamm is preaching even today and correlate that to what is coming out of Washington today.

Here is Dick Lamm’s verbatim speech he gave at the Federation for American Immigration Reform’s conferences in Washington, D.C. It was October 2003. Why is the date important? Because it reveals how his plan to destroy America seems to mirror the actions being taken by the Democrat Party under President Obama. It reveals an actual game plan that is marching forward like a slow moving clockwork towards a systematic change of our country; for the worse. Listen to what this guy is saying!

I have a plan to destroy America

By Richard D. Lamm

“I have a secret plan to destroy America. If you believe, as many do, that America is too smug, too white bread, too self-satisfied, too rich, let’s destroy America. It is not that hard to do. History shows that nations are more fragile than their citizens think. No nation in history has survived the ravages of time. Arnold Toynbee observed that all great civilizations rise and they all fall, and that “an autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.” Here is my plan:

  1. We must first make America a bilingual-bicultural country. History shows, in my opinion, that no nation can survive the tension, conflict and antagonism of two competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. One scholar, Seymour Martin Lipset, put it this way: “The histories of bilingual and bicultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension and tragedy. Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with its Basques, Bretons and Corsicans.”
  2. I would then invent “multiculturalism” and encourage immigrants to maintain their own culture. I would make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal: that there are no cultural differences that are important. I would declare it an article of faith that the black and Hispanic dropout rate is only due to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out-of-bounds.
  3. We can make the United States a “Hispanic Quebec” without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently, “The apparent success of our own multiethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved, not by tolerance, but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentrically, and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together.” I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with a salad bowl metaphor. It is important to insure that we have various cultural sub-groups living in America reinforcing their differences, rather than Americans emphasizing their similarities.
  4. Having done all this, I would make our fastest-growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50 percent dropout rate from school.
  5. I would then get the big foundations and big business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of victimology. I would get all minorities to think their lack of success was all the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority population.
  6. I would establish dual citizenship and promote divided loyalties. I would “celebrate diversity.” “Diversity” is a wonderfully seductive word. It stresses differences rather than commonalities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other–that is, when they are not killing each other. A “diverse,” peaceful or stable society is against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together, and we can take advantage of this myopia.

Look at the ancient Greeks. Dorf’s “World History” tells us: “The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshiped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic Games in honor of Zeus, and all Greeks venerated the shrine of Apollo at Delphi. A common enemy, Persia, threatened their liberty. Yet, all of these bonds together were not strong enough to overcome two factors … (local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions …)” If we can put the emphasis on the “pluribus,” instead of the “unum,” we can balkanize America as surely as Kosovo.

  1. Then I would place all these subjects off-limits–make it taboo to talk about. I would find a word similar to “heretic” in the 16th century that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking. Words like “racist”, “xenophobe” halt argument and conversation. Having made America a bilingual-bicultural country, having established multiculturalism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of “victimology,” I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra –”because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good.” I would make every individual immigrant sympatric and ignore the cumulative impact.
  2. Lastly, I would censor Victor Davis Hanson’s book “Mexifornia” –this book is dangerous; it exposes my plan to destroy America. So please, please–if you feel that America deserves to be destroyed–please, please–don’t buy this book! This guy is on to my plan.

“The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum.” –Noam Chomsky, American linguist and U.S. media and foreign policy critic.


Well, do we have a bilingual and multicultural society according the item 1 in the speech? Absolutely! And do you recall when white Americans wanted to adopt black children to help them get ahead. That was shot down because blacks, urged by Democrats, wanted these black children to not lose sight of their African roots. And now they call themselves African Americans. That makes me an English American but since I was born in England; that makes me even more so. And now even the language commonly found within the black community is nearly incomprehensible. Long ago, it was expected that everyone should be able to speak English. But now, there are Americans and Illegals who cannot speak English at all. Interesting enough, most countries teach English in their schools since it is the language of international business and it is the language required of pilots who fly international flights. Our black community is practically English illiterate.

How about item 2 in the speech? I covered most of it in the previous paragraph but key to note is the need to create cultural differences so those who oppose this overall plan can be called racist. And to stifle all other arguments. Keep calling decenters racist to eliminate free speech that contradicts the plan.

Item 3 pushes for getting away from a melting pot to a mixed salad. Get away from being American to being parts of sub-groups with their culture separate from the whole. I recall a battle cry of “divide and conquer.” And it is clearly working.

Then we come to item 4 which is a subsequent initiative designed to keep people uneducated and in a constant state of potential revolt. What is happening in the Hispanic and Black communities follows the plan in that dropout rates, part of the intended plan, are exceeding the goal of 50%.

We in the majority get blamed for causing the problem in item 5. The method is to get the have nots to believe they are victims.

In item 6, it is trying to emphasize the need for diversity which includes the idea of dual citizenship. Interesting enough, you can actually create the same situation by giving amnesty to millions who cannot speak English. Even the system we currently see about moving illegal children to the guardianship of anyone claiming to be a relative, distant or otherwise.

The next item covers creating out of the blue names to call people who buck the plan. Call them racist or xenophobes or any other “phobe” you can think of to suppress an argument. I, for one, am sick of being called a racist just because of my party affiliation or because I want immigration laws enforced. Or, just because my skin is white.

And how about the item 8, where Lamm asks a question, if you believe America needs to be destroyed, don’t read a book called “Mexifornia” which talks about California being overrun by Hispanics and suggesting ways to stop it.

Lamm concludes by quoting an idea by Noam Chomsky where you keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum. Interesting how the term “PC” or political correctness is the Democrats attempt to follow this Chomsky method to take over a country and destroy it from within.

Richard “Dick” Lamm is still preaching the same old line and PBS TV seems to be his primary platform to getting the word out to liberals. The majority of contributors to this program are liberals and the rest comes from tax dollars driven primary by Democrat Government Officials. And that program is one of their primary outlets for President Obama to get his ideology out to primarily a demographic of liberals. The president goes where he can be sure he will get softball questions and not held responsible by the rest of the nation for what he does.

Dick Lamm, Barak Obama and Noam Chomsky are cut from the same cloth. The destruction of America is a primary goal. If you want to try to understand why this President does what he does, or Democrats say what they say, you need to look at from the “how to destroy America” game plan they follow as documented by Dick Lamm.

Related posts:

Flower Power VS Occupiers - NOT
Questions for Democrats
Liberals Are Genius at Everything They Do

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read previous post:
ISIS is the Problem and So is Islam

I just heard on a mainstream media sight that they have determined that all these attacks in Canada and the...